2222 unread replies.2323 replies.
Your main posting is due thisMonday, September 28th.In order to adequately answer the questions posed, your main posting should be at least500 wordslong.
Two replies (at least five sentences each)to your classmates are due onWednesday, September 30th.
Please make sure to highlightwhat you found insightful about your classmates’ posts.
Please use a spell checker toidentify grammatical errorsbefore submitting your work.
Discussion Post Assignment Description (4 parts):
1.)Please readChapter 7 MindinPhilosophy the Basicsas well as the excerpt below, and watch the video on consciousness.Please use these resources to answer the following questions:
What is the Mind/Body Problem?
If the mind is immaterial, how would movement possibly affect our thoughts and subjective experiences?
Consider the phrase, ‘Dancing Mind, Thinking Body’. We may often notice that our thoughts and ideas may flow more freely when we go for a walk or we may be able to resolve the issues of the day while we’re taking a jog or run. Sensations of fear or being overwhelmed may subside as we move.
How is our gut considered our “first brain”? Taking into consideration the Japanese concept of ‘hara’,could we conclude that the body is the mind and the mind is the body?
What is consciousness and how does the video explain why it evolved?
THE MIND/BODY PROBLEM
“In the way we describe ourselves and the worldweusually make a distinctionbetween the mental and physical aspects. Mental aspects aresuch things as thinking, feeling, deciding, dreaming, imagining,wishing, and so on. Physical ones include feet, limbs, our brains,cups of tea, the Empire State Building, and so on.When we do something, such as play tennis, we use both our mentaland our physical aspects: we think about the rules of the game, where our opponent is likely to play the next shot, and soon, andwe move our bodies. Butis there a real division between mindand body, or is this just a convenient way of talking about ourselves?The problem of explaining the true relationship between mindand body is known as the Mind/Body Problem.”
Descartes and the Discovery of the Mind-Body Problem
“The French philosopher Ren Descartes is often credited with discovering the mind-body problem, a mystery that haunts philosophers to this day. The reality is more complicated than that.
We have inherited the sharp distinction between mind and body, though not exactly in Descartess form, but we have not inherited Descartess “solution” to the mind-body problem. So we are left with the problem, minus a solution.We see that the experiences we have, such as experiences of color, areindeed very differentfrom the electromagnetic radiation that ultimately produces them, orfrom the activity of the neurons in the brain. We are bound to wonderhow the uncolored radiation can produce the color, even if its effects can be followed as far as the neurons in the visual cortex.In other words, we make a sharp distinction between physics and physiology on the one hand, and psychology on the other, without a principled way to connect them.Physicsconsists of a set of concepts that includesmass,velocity,electron,wave, and so on, butdoes not include the conceptsred,yellow,black, and the like.Physiology includes the conceptsneuron,glial cell,visual cortex, and so on, but does not include the concept of color. In the framework of current scientific theory, red is apsychologicalterm, not a physical one. Thenour problem can be very generally described as the difficulty of describing the relationship between the physical and the psychological, since, as Princess Elisabeth and Gassendi realized, they possess no common relating terms.”
“Thenewly identified neuronal firing patternmay represent an early feature preserved through the evolution of nervous systems.
The enteric nervous system (ENS) is known as the “second brain” or thebrain in the gutbecause it can operate independently of the brain and spinal cord, the central nervous system (CNS). It has also been called the“first brain”based on evidence suggesting that the ENS evolved before the CNS.”
“The word Hara is a Japanese word that has no equivalent in English. While it literally refersto the lower abdomen, the term also has psychological and spiritual connotations in Japaneselanguage and culture. In fact, Hara can be seen as the unification ofa person’s physical,psychological and spiritual dimensions. That being said Hara has many definitions of what itis in the way how it functions and by the description and translation, but despite of all thedifferent views of Hara they all have mostly thisin common;“Hara is a place in a persons body and it’s a place of energy”.There are some open translations of Hara that can be understood for example as a “sea ofenergy”, a “seat of enlightenment”, or even as“the center of universe”.
“In Japanese, hara (abdomen) is considered to be the place where ideas and feelings are located.”
“An ancient Daoist saying tells us “When you are sick, do not seek a cure. Find your centre and you will be healed.” The centre it refers to is located deep in the sensed interiority of our belly, that abode of the soul known in Japanese as hara. ‘Depression’ (a word with no equivalent in Japanese) is, in essence, a lack of hara. With hara awareness we not only recontact our own innermost soul depths and soul centre. We learn to make contact with others from that centre – to experience true intimacy of soul. Hara awareness is both an alternative to medical and psychiatric ‘cures’ and the basis for a genuinely psychological medicine – an anatomy of the soul-body.”
2.)Please watch the following videos and read the excerpts below.Please use these resources to answer the following questions:
How does philosopher Peter Godrey-Smith use the example of cellular life to illustrate how we should ‘think the right way’ about the biological basis of the mind? (2:50 in video)
How did an octopus’s tentacles evolve to think for themselves? (15:00 in video)
How does Godrey-Smith explain an octopus’s experience of felt pain/interior sensation/subjective experience? (18:10 in video)
How does the octopus surprise researchers with its ingenuity in the last video below?
“InOther Minds,, a distinguished philosopher of science and a skilled scuba diver, tells a bold new story ofhow subjective experience crept into beinghow nature became aware of itself. But what kind of intelligence do cephalopods possess? Drawing on the latest scientific research and his own scuba-diving adventures, Godfrey-Smith probes the many mysteries that surround the lineage. How did the octopus, a solitary creature with little social life, become so smart? What is it like to haveeight tentacles that are so packed with neurons that they virtually think for themselves?What happens when some octopuses abandon their hermit-like ways and congregate, as they do in a unique location off the coast of Australia?
By tracing the question of inner life back to its roots and comparing human beings with our most remarkable animal relatives, Godfrey-Smith casts crucial new light on the octopus mindand on our own.”
While stroking an octopus, it is easy to fall into reverie,Sy Montgomery wrote in her breathtaking inquiry into.To share such a moment of deep tranquility with another being, especially one as different from us as the octopus, is a humbling privilege an uplink to universal consciousness.
Studying how intelligence can arise along such a divergent evolutionary path can help us understand more about intelligence and consciousness in general who knows what other forms of intelligent life are possible, or how they process the world around them.”
3.)Please watch the following read the excerpt below.Please use this resource to answer the following questions:
At what point in evolution did humans split from the lineage that would lead to the octopus? Why is this so fascinating?
How does Sy Montgomery argue that the octopus must be inhabiting an altogether different version of what we call reality?
How does Montgomery argue that the octupus experiences consciousness and is not just reacting to instinct?
How does Montgomery’s immersion into the ocean seem to alter her perspective of reality and lead to her assertion that the octopus has a soul?
What are some of the recommendations for the ethical care of octopuses and against octopus farming? Why is it now more important than ever that we know not just that octopuses think, but also what they think/perceive?
Despite centuries of investigation by everyone from natural historians, psychologists, and psychiatrists, to ethicists, neuroscientists, and philosophers, there is still no universal definition of emotion or consciousness,Laurel Braitman wrote in her. Virginia Woolf defined consciousness asbut even if were able to ride the wave, we hardly know the ocean out of which it arises.
The octopus is a creature magnificently dissimilar to us it can change shape and color, tastes with its skin, has its mouth in its armpit, and is capable of squeezing its entire body through a hole the size of an apple. And since we humans experience reality, based on our individual consciousnesses, then the octopus must be inhabiting an altogether different version of what we call reality.
The constellation of complexities comprising this difference, Montgomery reveals over the course of this miraculously insightful and enchanting book, expands our understanding of consciousness and sheds light on the very notion of what we call a soul.
More than half a billion years ago, the lineage that would lead to octopuses and the one leading to humans separated.Was it possible, I wondered, to reach another mind on the other side of that divide? Octopuses represent the great mystery of the Other.
Montgomery notes that octopuses have highly individual personalities and can exhibit marked curiosity faculties we tend to think of as singularly human. Even their motives for friendliness and unfriendliness, far from the baseless brutality of depictions like Hugos, parallel our own:
In one study, Seattle Aquarium biologist Roland Anderson exposed eight giant Pacific octopuses to two unfamiliar humans, dressed identically in blue aquarium uniforms. One person consistently fed a particular octopus, and another always touched it with a bristly stick. Within a week, at first sight of the people looking up at them through the water, without even touching or tasting them most of the octopuses moved toward the feeder and away from the irritator. Sometimes the octopus would aim its water-shooting funnel, the siphon near the side of the head with which an octopus jets through the sea, at the person who had touched it with the bristly stick.
Surely, a skeptic might argue that this is more instinct than consciousness. But Montgomery goes on to outline a number of strikingly specific and context-considered behaviors indicating that octopuses are animated by complex conscious experiences things we tend to term thoughts and feelings in the human realm that upend our delusions of exceptionalism. Lest we forget, we haveof bolstering those delusions by putting other species down, much like petty egotists try to make themselves feel big by making other people feel small even Jane Goodallwhen she first suggested that chimpanzees have consciousness.
Pacific giant octopus by photographer Susan Middleton from her project
But beyond intellectual considerations of this weird and wonderful creatures inner life, Montgomery points to the physical, bodily presence with an octopus as a transcendent experience in its own right one that pulls into question our most basic assumptions about consciousness:
While stroking an octopus, it is easy to fall into reverie. To share such a moment of deep tranquility with another being, especially one as different from us as the octopus, is a humbling privilege. Its a shared sweetness, a gentle miracle, an uplink to universal consciousness.
Indeed, the books greatest reward isnt the fascinating science although that is riveting and ablaze with rigor but Montgomerys bewitching prose, pouring from the soul of a literary naturalist who paints the marvels of the oceans depths like Thoreau did the marvels of the New England woods. Finding herself drunk with strange splendors as she beholds the marine worlds parade of wonders, Montgomery writes:
A splendid toadfish hides beneath a rock. Once thought to live only in Cozumel, its pancake flat, with thin, wavy, horizontal blue and white stripes, Day-Glo yellow fins, and whiskery barbels. A four-foot nurse shark sleeps beneath a coral shelf, peaceful as a prayer. A trumpet fish, yellow with dark stripes, floats with its long, tubular snout down, trying to blend in with some branching coral A school of iridescent pink and yellow fish slide by inches from our masks, then wheel in unison like birds in the sky.
I have known no natural state more like a dream than this. I feel elation cresting into ecstasy and experience bizarre sensations: my own breath resonates in my skull, faraway sounds thump in my chest, objects appear closer and larger than they really are. Like in a dream, the impossible unfolds before me, and yet I accept it unquestioningly. Beneath the water, I find myself in an altered state of consciousness, where the focus, range, and clarity of perception are dramatically changed.
Suddenly acutely aware that the octopuses she has met and come to love on her expeditions experience this dizzying otherworldliness as their basic backdrop of existence, she considers the limited array of sensations and perceptions that weve come to accept as the whole or reality:
The ocean, for me, is what LSD was to Timothy Leary. He claimed the hallucinogen is to reality what a microscope is to biology, affording a perception of reality that was not before accessible. Shamans and seekers eat mushrooms, drink potions, lick toads, inhale smoke, and snort snuff to transport their minds to realms they cannot normally experience.
[]
In my scuba-induced altered state, Im not in the grip of a drug: I am lucid in my immersion, voluntarily becoming part of what feels like the oceans own dream.
Out of this perspective-shifting consideration arises Montgomerys most profound inquiry. Sitting in a Tahitian temple dedicated to the spirit of the octopus, where one of her expeditions has taken her, she wonders:
What is the soul? Some say it is the self, the I that inhabits the body; without the soul, the body is like a lightbulb with no electricity. But it is more than the engine of life, say others; it is what gives life meaning and purpose. Soul is the fingerprint of God.
Others say that soul is our innermost being, the thing that gives us our senses, our intelligence, our emotions, our desires, our will, our personality, and identity. One calls soul the indwelling consciousness that watches the mind come and go, that watches the world pass. Perhaps none of these definitions is true. Perhaps all of them are. But I am certain of one thing as I sit in my pew: If I have a soul and I think I do an octopus has a soul, too.
What is good for an octopus?
“TheUmweltor perceptual worldof the octopus is likely to bevastly different from our own.They do not perceive colour, but rather the plane of polarisationof light.They exist within an aquatic environment that allows for sensitivity to chemical andmechanical cues weare notable to perceive. This means that when considering their welfare,these environmental conditions must beincluded.
Current recommendations for octopushusbandry refer to lighting brightness and appropriate day/night cycles but have not consideredlight polarisation.Lights which appear gentle to the human eyemay not be so within the octopus perceptual range, so light polarisation shouldalsobe measuredandtaken into account. Chemicals within the tankcanaffecthealth but may also bepleasant oraversive in ways we may not usuallyconsider.Chemosensory enrichment opportunities couldopen up new avenues of exploration.Vibrations through the watercan have a large impact onoctopus health and welfare, withnoise and vibration controlformingacorepart of the guidelines for octopus husbandry.Matheralso describestwoof the primary needsmotivatingoctopus behaviourexploration and fear.
These areverylikely to impact octopus welfare andshouldaccordinglyforman important part ofoctopushusbandry.She provides evidence thatoctopuses have a strongmotivation to explore, beyond simply thepotential for extrinsic (food) reward.Provision ofnovelenvironments and objects for octopuses to exploreishencelikely to be centraltooctopuswelfare,toprevent boredom and frustration.The guidelines for cephalopod care recommendcomplex enriched environments;this evidence gives us reason to give thisparticular recommendation a highpriority.Matheralso shows that octopuses, lacking theprotective shell of their mollusc relatives,probablyoften feel vulnerable;indeedtheyare mostoften found near suitable shelter.It will almost certainly be crucialfor octopus welfareto providesufficient refuge, such as opaque tank walls and shelters, toprovidea feeling of safetyand allowthe opportunitytoretreat.
Finally,personality differences between differentoctopuses give us reason to consider their needs not just as members of a species, but asindividuals as well.These concerns areparticularly relevant against the background ofrecentdebate onwhether octopuses should be farmed for consumption, withthedesire for cheaper and moreeasily obtainable octopus meat conflicting with environmental and welfare concerns. Although there are currently few such farmsmostly in the trial stageit is likelythattheir numbers will rise in the near future. Within this context,it is nowimportantthat weknownot justthatoctopuses think, but alsowhatthey think.A better understanding ofoctopuswelfareneeds could be used to provide a stronger case againsttheirfarming if their needs cannot be met(as Jacquet et al.2019argue,they cannot).Failing that, it can also help to ensure higher welfarestandards if such farms do inevitably arise.
Therecognition of octopus sentience has led to legislation and regulations for theirprotection within laboratory settings.It makes sense that similar regulationsshouldalsobe in place fortheuse of octopuses in farming, based on what we know about octopuswelfare. Welfare standardsthusdeveloped can also be applied to other captive octopuseshousedin laboratories and aquariums.The mindof an octopus may be highly different from our own, butit is only by trying to see the world from their point of view that we will be able tofind out whatis good for themand henceensure their welfare.
4.)Please watch the following videos and read the excerpts below.Please use these resources to answer the following questions:
What is the theory of panpsychism?
How do trees communicate with one another?
How is it argued that plants experience sentience?
“Modern panpsychism is the idea that some incredibly simple version of our own conscious experience is one of the fundamental properties of our universes matter, just like mass, charge, and spin, and that human beings inherit our complex consciousness from the intricately-related consciousness of our many material parts.
This contrasts on the one hand with dualism, the idea that matter is entirely unconscious, so something special and immaterial has to be added to make humans, and with physicalism, the idea that matter is entirely unconscious, and human consciousness is just an intricate arrangements of those unconscious goings-on.”
Most of us infer sentience to certain non-human animals.However, as we cannot acquire the report of consciousness from animals, wecannot establishdirectneural correlates of consciousness(as this requiresboth mindand mattercorrelates). Thus our assumption of their sentience is not based on neurology so much as behaviour.Consider, especially, the octopus:its brain, two-thirds of whichlie inits arms, isvery dissimilar to ourbrain,yet the intelligent behaviour of thesea creature renders a denialofsentience toitimplausible.Thus wedoattributesentienceto it thoughwe do not havea strict criterionby which we do so.So wecanbut infersentience rather than verify it, and people will differ intheir guessed inferences: somemight stop sentience at the lobster limit, others might stop at the beetle borderbut why stop at all?
Ifone demands a stop, the determining criterion must beestablished.If one proposes that such a criterion be that a being cansense and adapt to its environment, then onehas almost become panpsychist by allowing for the sentience of plants. For instance, biologist DanielChamovitz writes that,we nowknow thatArabidopsis [thaliana]has at least eleven different photoreceptors: sometell a plant when to germinate, some tell it when to bend to the light, some tell it when to flower,and some let it know when its night time. Some let the plant know that theres a lot of lighthitting it, some let it know that the light is dim, and some help it to keep time. Thus eyes are not required to perceive light, just as muscles are not required to move. Therefore if onewants a criterionthatrules out plants as sentient, it cannot be based on the ability to sense or adapt.Somore commonly-held, stricter criterion for sentience is the possession of a complexnervous system,or abrain. One may believe this to be the case because one can gaugecorrelationsbetweenhumanbrain events and mental events, via brain scans, brain damage, drug use, etc.Hence this mistakenargument:
1. If brain then sentience [based on human neural correlates of consciousness]
2.No brain [e.g. in a plant]
3.Therefore, no sentience [i.e.in the plant].
But this argument is an obvious example ofthe fallacy of denying the antecedent. It is equivalentto arguing thatif you drink hemlock you will die, you did not drink hemlock, thereforeyou will not die (an easy way to acquire immortality!).Just as therecould be otherways to die otherthan by hemlock, so therecould beother ways to have sentience other than by having a brain.The philosopher Friedrich Paulsen, following the lead ofrenowned panpsychist and founder ofpsychophysics, Gustav Theodor Fechner, puts the point this way:With what functions, with what marks that are lacking in plants, is inner life [sentience]connected?Reference is made to the absence of a nervous system and brain. … [But] thesyllogism is worthless. It is formulated on the plan: Horses dogs, and cats have legs, withoutwhich they cannot move; therefore creatures without legs cannot move. Snakes and wormscontradict the syllogism. There may be othersystematicsubstrata ofmatter that correlate to sentience other than those of theanimal brain. If one believes in the possibility of machine, or robot sentience, one cannot disagree.Plants do not have neurons but they have otherparts bywhich they transmit information, as do single-celled organisms, viruses, molecules andmore.”
Search entries or authorFilter replies by unreadUnread Collapse replies Expand replies
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more